![]() ![]() I just don't want to, as I do not consider it very relevant. I bet that if you got involved, we could have another masterpiece to comparison :) It appears to be really challenging build and many fail on it. I bet that if you got involved, we could have another masterpiece to comparison :) Edited Jby krisandkris12ĮDIT: By the way I'm sorry to hear that you don't consider building bigger invisible hand - there aren't many of those and I only know one, that is really wonderful, made by Mark Kelso. I'm myself trying to build a series of SW ships in particular scale and it's sometimes frustrating like hell, yet the feeling of figuring it out eventually is really special :)ĮDIT: By the way I'm sorry to hear that you don't consider building bigger invisible hand - there aren't many of those and I only know one, that is really wonderful, made by Mark Kelso. I personally admire good creation regardless it's scale but I have some extra appreciation for these 'in scale' models (if greatly executed) because of the fact the designer was limited from the very beginning and all the way through. Meanwhile, accepting the challenge to create your model in some particular size or 'in scale' to something else is different thing and it can be even more satisfactory if you succeed in it. Picking the scale best to fit your needs is one way, smart way since it makes designing easier (however it requires a lot of experience to do the 'math' and make the correct choice - im not by far saying it's trivial or that it lowers the credit designer should get). I think it's just another way you can approach building. So sorry, a IH to scale with Venator is not on my todo list. You can very hardly set a scale and say "I will do all my models with that scale". Or at least, it wouldn't work as well as a 27 cm long version.Įach model (ship, car, helicopter, whatever) is a different project with different goals, limits, compromises, different spirits to catch, etc. But the thing is that designing, for example, a 22 cm long F40, just wouldn't work. With that length, the car is maybe not at the same scale of set X or Y. Same goes for other UCS sets and many other sets. The ship, its shapes, the accuracy you need, the flow, the building standards, etc lead you to conclud that one size is better (more convenient, if you will) than others. It is hard to explain, but to make it short and understandable :įor example, if the B-Wing UCS 10227 is 66cm long is for one good reason : you can't design correctly a UCS B-Wing of 50 cm long or 85 cm long. That said, if I did so, there is some good reason : I think the model looks good at this scale size. At the same time, Anio himself did not make the model so he did not have much control over how big the MOC would be, however, he could possibly redo this MOC to a larger scale ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |